Search for: "People v. Label" Results 81 - 100 of 4,214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2021, 3:20 pm by Christine Corcos
Yet, when the actors are flipped, and the museum (via its agents) enters the homes or lands of certain peoples, the law labels that 'an acquisition' and the thief turn into 'a collector.' Critical Race Theory (CRT) gives us a legal analytical tool to reconsider these labels, definitions, and outcomes. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 3:20 pm
Yet, when the actors are flipped, and the museum (via its agents) enters the homes or lands of certain peoples, the law labels that 'an acquisition' and the thief turn into 'a collector.' Critical Race Theory (CRT) gives us a legal analytical tool to reconsider these labels, definitions, and outcomes. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:26 am by Jeffrey Carr
Some drugs have absolutely horrific side effects, including death, but since they work for the vast majority of people, they’re on the market, and appropriately labeled. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 3:13 pm
Reg. 3922 (Jan. 24, 2006); Larkin v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 3:13 pm
As was recognized in Thompson v Utah, labels are not particularly helpful in this area of constitutional analysis, since changes affecting the penalty for or the substance of a crime may easily be disguised as procedural enactments. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 1:26 pm
  Or do we disproportionately label events "tragic" when we think a large number of people (e.g., nonlawyers) might be reading the opinion? [read post]