Search for: "People v. Levell (1988)"
Results 81 - 100
of 461
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
This statute was mentioned by the Court in 1988 as support for its opinion in the famous independent counsel case, Morrison v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:51 am
”In 1988, 43 years after the end of the war, President Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act that compensated more than 80,000 people of Japanese descent who were imprisoned in camps during World War II. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:23 am
Kansas v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:33 pm
See Wise v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm
Part of having transparency in the tax code is having the people’s representatives decide if there will be a tax increase. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:23 am
It is likely to pass as 25 out of the 27 ballot initiatives to increase the minimum wage were approved from 1988 to 2018. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 4:01 am
The Firm In 1988, Besen formed Besen & Associates, Inc. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:31 am
” 518 So. 2d 1389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:13 pm
Patricia Schmitz v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Question: In 1989, while he was chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Thomas published a law review article based on remarks delivered at a 1988 Federalist Society event. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
“If two people try to solve a crossword puzzle together, it may be easy to say who first uttered the correct answer to a clue, but more difficult to answer who contributed to it when the solution emerged from a prior discussion. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 7:17 pm
Hennis, 323 N.C. 279 (1988)). [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 4:00 pm
Did two people named Noerr and Pennington invent the doctrine? [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 3:49 am
This case (R v Gold & Schifreen (1988) 1 AC 1063) resulted in the Computer Misuse Act 1990. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 8:37 am
Youngevity Int’l v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
So too, in Flowers v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
Canada, [1988] 3 F.C. 622 (T.D.). [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 12:50 pm
Supreme Court in Nix v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm
Anyway, it’s probably a non-starter of a suggestion, since there are very few if any people in Canada who are sufficiently expert lawyers or economists to fulfill this role and who would not already have too much baggage to carry and still be perceived as credible to all concerned.So, I expect that my fear – shared by others – that this gratuitous statutory references to the “public interest” and a “competitive market” will become an excuse… [read post]
