Search for: "People v. Loftis"
Results 81 - 100
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am
The Guardian also published a lofty manifesto by Nick Clegg (pic) in defence of the draft bill. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:19 am
The background to this issue is that in the 2005 decision of Hirst (No. 2),the European Court held that Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983, which prevents prisoners from voting, is in breach of the electoral right under Article 1 of Protocol 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
A permanent Portuguese fort was established at Arguin in 1448, and the 1452 Dum Diversas papal bull of Pope Nicholas V specifically authorized Alfonso V of Portugal, …full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens and pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be… and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
People increasingly demand food in its natural form to nourish their bodies down to the cellular level. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:30 pm
” (In re Deshaun, supra, 148 Cal.App.4th at 1387, quoting People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 5:40 pm
Have you ever noticed that people with lofty job titles are almost always paid on a salary basis? [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:27 pm
Politicians are elected by people; they have a right to know the financial antecedents. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:34 am
SS offers several lofty reasons for deciding to go into private practice. [read post]
8 May 2009, 12:09 pm
It wasn't Henry V at Agincourt. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:44 pm
Similarly, perhaps Second Amendment advocates can and should be able to use the ruling in Miller v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 3:50 am
In Keating v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
The opposite approach is what Nussbaum calls "lofty formalism," represented by cases like Ledbetter v Goodyear and Parents Involved v Seattle School District. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 11:00 am
Zabar's & Co. v. [read post]
