Search for: "People v. Mapp" Results 81 - 100 of 110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Perhaps if questions of actual guilt or innocence are at issue, but most of the Court's most controversial criminal procedure rules, such as Mapp and Miranda, operate to free clearly guilty people with little benefit for innocent defendants.And is Mapp really a rule of criminal procedure within Justice Stevens' rights framework, anyway? [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:06 pm by Jeralyn
(He was not a fan of the blanket policy, at least not in that case, but in Mapp v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  One study back in the 60’s showed that in the years after Mapp v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:06 pm
Wainwright (the 1963 decision requiring that poor people be represented by counsel when charged with serious crimes) and Mapp v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 3:23 am
Supreme Court adopted this principle - known as the exclusionary rule - in 1961 in Mapp v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:04 am by Bruce M. Robinson
" This amendment, part of the Bill of Rights, made applicable to the individual states through the 14th amendment Due Process clause as established by the Supreme Court in Mapp v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 7:23 am
  How Cardozo ridiculed it, and how the Supremes may get their chance to play with Mapp v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:18 pm
Walker (1965) that “the exclusionary rule announced in Mapp (v. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 10:55 am
At issue in People v Bryant, 2007 NY Slip Op 03791, was whether the Appellate Division properly upheld the trial court 's denial of defendant's motion for a Mapp/Dunaway hearing. [read post]