Search for: "People v. Martinez"
Results 81 - 100
of 465
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2010, 10:09 am
On June 29, 2010, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, decided People v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:45 am
If the get up had been very similar or more people had been deceived, the situation may have been different. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 12:54 am
We note that, because the sentence is illegal, we reach this issue despite defendant's failure to raise it either at the time of sentencing or on appeal (see People v Adams, 45 AD3d 1346; People v Martinez, 213 AD2d 1072). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:24 am
However, Smith remains the law, and CLS v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:00 pm
The Los Angeles Times has this story about a pending California Supreme Court case, Martinez v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 9:40 am
People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm
This duty of fair dealing encompasses an obligation to ensure fairness in grand jury submissions (People v Pelchat, supra; People v Jordan, 153 AD2d 263 [2nd Dept 1990]; People v Russo, 128 Misc2d 876, 880 [Co Ct Suffolk Co 1985]), which includes notice of the grand jury proceedings that gives a defendant a reasonable opportunity to exercise his right to testify, not mere technical compliance with minimum statutory notice requirements… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 7:20 am
If you thought you had an ugly divorce, you may reconsider after hearing about Nozolino v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 7:13 am
Martinez (08-1371). [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:03 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 8:19 am
Steward Machine Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:59 am
The 29 people were connected to the Somali Outlaws, the Somali Mafia and the Lady Outlaws, officials said.The three-day federal sweep, called Operation Cross Country V, involved 40 cities nationwide and is part of the Innocence Lost National Initiative, authorities said. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:43 pm
People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 2:27 pm
Martinez in the evolution of federal law. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:49 pm
Haynes Investments, LLC (Payday Lending)Martinez v. [read post]
Kolkevich: REAL ID Had Hidden Deadline Requiring People Barred From Appealing Only 30 Days To Appeal
7 Sep 2007, 4:21 am
Gonzales and Ruiz-Martinez v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 4:07 am
Martinez, 2007 U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:32 pm
In 1976, the Supreme Court decided in U.S. v Martinez-Fuerte that Border Patrol may operate checkpoints and stop vehicles, without a warrant, for brief questioning of their immigration status even if they have no particularized suspicion of unlawful activity or immigration status. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 2:00 pm
(People v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
People seem to forget that the Court has no deadline for hearing cases on its docket, as demonstrated by the fact that it took more than five years to decide Martinez v. [read post]
