Search for: "People v. Nixon"
Results 81 - 100
of 527
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
-Marbury v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:23 am
Constitution Daily’s We the People podcast “explores what the appointments of Kavanaugh and Gorsuch might mean for the future of the Supreme Court and constitutional law. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:04 am
" #cbftech @GoldnI Brown v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
”Trump v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 7:08 pm
“Yesterday, open statements were heard in the case of The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:21 am
Note: In California, the ACLU has launched a campaign to get elected officials to enact sentencing reform as they strive to resolve the state's budget crisis and implement the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:40 am
These people should have come forward sooner, and they should now urgently consider coming forward to testify publicly - and with documents. [read post]
29 May 2007, 11:51 pm
Darby and Wickard v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 1:15 pm
Justice Scalia's dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:30 am
This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.The ERA continued to be introduced to every subsequent congress after its failure in 1923, until 1972, when the amendment was passed in the House, Senate, and was signed by President Richard Nixon. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:19 pm
Miranda v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:43 am
The return of judicial discretion with the United Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:40 am
Based on the foregoing, Lindenwood’s factual allegations fail to support the element of proximate cause (see Levine v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, 256 AD2d at 149-150; Gersh v Nixon Peabody LLP, 2017 NY Slip Op 30363[U], 2017 NY Misc LEXIS 682, * 18-19 [Sup Ct, NY County 2017]; Caso v Sklarin, 2016 NY Misc LEXIS 6863, * 12-13 [Sup Ct, NY County May 26, 2016, No. 159192/2015]). [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
In sharp contrast with Nixon v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 8:15 am
The Title X program dates back to 1970 when, at President Nixon’s urging, a bipartisan Congress enacted it to improve access to family planning and to make birth control like “the pill” and IUDs available to all regardless of their income. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Frankly, I am not sure there is a right answer to the question rather reasonably and informed people of good faith, certainly such people whom I respect of that nature, can hold diametrically opposed opinions. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 1:03 pm
Most people had never heard of this provision of the Constitution. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:34 pm
I know one place that Keefe won’t be getting a job: Nixon Peabody. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
