Search for: "People v. Northern" Results 81 - 100 of 2,225
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2023, 10:30 am by Unknown
Testimonies of Movement, Pain and Exchange (Borders and Limitations: The IMS Blog, Oct. 2023) [text]- Discusses the 1923 Convention and Protocol on the Exchange of the Greek and Turkish Peoples. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on September 22, 2023.People 30 and older were supposedly banned from living in employee housing, making it difficult for many to resume their seasonable employment.Since such conduct allegedly violated the ADEA, the EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
Pix Credit hereThe greatest and most significant achievement during the last decades has been the independence from colonial and alien domination of a large number of peoples and nations which has enabled them to become members of the community of free peoples. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
 In Re D [2008] 1 WLR 1499 at [27] Lord Carswell approved what had been said by Richards LJ in R (N) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Region) [2006] QB 468 at [62] who had said, ‘Although there is a single civil standard of proof on the balance of probabilities, it is flexible in its application. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
” The defendant reviewed the records of 145 people between 17 January and 17 October 2019 “without having a business need to do so. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  As we discuss further in Section IV, SB 264 is also the subject of  a constitutional and statutory challenge in the federal courts in the case of Shen v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:35 pm by Ben Sperry
Ohio Elections Comm’n); and anonymously sign people up for petitions (1999’s Buckley v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]