Search for: "People v. Novo"
Results 81 - 100
of 504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2010, 8:43 am
See, e.g., Wiggins v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:23 am
People v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:40 am
The Court of Appeals began its analysis of Castillo’s argument by noting that it reviewsde novo the district court's denial of a Rule 29 motion for a judgment of acquittal. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am
Download CRT v Barr. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
’People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:42 pm
Fudge v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 11:13 am
(Home Ins., supra, 34 Cal.4th at p. 1037; People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
Benson, Jones v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
The court then prefaced its analysis of the issues in the case by explaining that it reviews the order granting or denying the motion to strike de novo. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:45 pm
We are collaterally reviewing Jonathan Doody’s conviction for the murder of nine people that was already upheld on direct review by the Arizona Court of Appeals, and our review is not de novo—as the majority treats it—but deferential. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 12:21 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual PropertyCourt Denies Preliminary Injunction Against New, Inhalable Diabetes Treatment Novo Nordisk A/S v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 5:50 am
People v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 6:14 am
People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 3:36 pm
The case below was ACLU of Fla, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:35 am
Cecil Morgan KINGS COUNTYLegal Profession Civil Court Cannot Grant Equitable Relief; Attorney Must Commence De Novo Action in Supreme Court Pruzan v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
(Orin Kerr) Reading the blog and media reaction to Judge Reinhardt’s opinion for the Ninth Circuit in Perry v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 4:55 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 5:23 am
” This might seem fairly obvious to some, as this is what people think the courts’ job would be, but in 1984, the Supreme Court ruled in Chevron v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:37 am
People v. [read post]