Search for: "People v. Oxford"
Results 81 - 100
of 873
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2023, 2:11 pm
From today's Michigan Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 11:47 am
”The most recent adoption of a Restatement section by the Washington Supreme Court was in Gerlach v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
The former party leaders argued that the change would modernise government records, making it easier and more secure for people to access public services. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
Barrister and President of Magadelen College, Oxford, Dinah Rose KC, is set to sue the Times for an article which quoted the Bar Standards Board as saying her interpretation of the “cab rank rule” might amount to recklessness, if taken at its highest. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 11:35 pm
BCZ[10] and Enka v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 10:50 pm
”▫️You can find out by attending the Oxford Film Festival, which is being held from March 1-5, 2023, as “SWAT” will be among the 100+ films (from across the globe) that have been selected to compete. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
For example, the plaintiff in Bulun Bulun v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am
’ The investigation tracked five units designed to tackle fake news, which were found to have monitored comments that criticised the government, including statements made by Sir Kier Starmer, academics from Oxford University and UCL, and the Big Brother Watch staff. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte PLC: A Landmark of LegalismACL Davies (University of Oxford, UK)9. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
At Oxford, I attended the last of Ronald Dworkin’s lecture series at Oxford on “What is Law? [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
As always, I begin with heartfelt thanks to the people who have actually made this quite remarkable series of gatherings possible. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 2:44 pm
Supreme Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 9:07 am
Maybe the author wrote the line that way to sound archaic to the people of 1966.That's her tomb, you may realize. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 9:30 pm
McMahon (Oxford University Press).ICYMI: The 1,800 congressmen who owned enslaved Black people (WaPo). [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Co. for Life & Health Ins. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am
While the decision of Morgan v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
” (the answer, for most people, is likely to be “not very well”). [read post]
