Search for: "People v. Profit (1986)" Results 81 - 100 of 153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although it implicates a broader set of issues, for now the injunction only applies with respect to the plaintiffs in Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:07 am
After having been authorised to use the Ferrari’s trade marks to carry out non-profitable activities for almost ten years, from 1986 the Club used the de facto trade mark "Ferrari Club Milano" although not being part of the official Ferrari Club network approved by Ferrari (and leaded by the Ferrari Club Italia). [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am by amy
 Trenton and Deepa run two not-for-profit organisations, This Is Not A Gateway and Myrdle Court Press. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am by amy
 Trenton and Deepa run two not-for-profit organisations, This Is Not A Gateway and Myrdle Court Press. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 4:26 pm by Jennifer Granick
Small sellers with no profits could be subject to audits in dozens of states. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:18 am by Terry Hart
One of the earliest and most influential cases to enunciate this doctrine was Pope v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am by Charles Johnson
  Edwards convinced investors to buy payphones and lease them back to ETS for what Edwards claimed would be a guaranteed profit of approximately 14 percent per year. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm by Clayton Simms, Criminal Defense Attorney
In addition to its symbolic occupation of a public space, Occupy SLC displayed a number of signs and banners with messages such as, “Choose Human Need Over Corporate Greed,” “Honk If Wall Street Fails You,” “People Are Not Commodities,” “Corporate Profit is Human Theft” and “Corporations are not People and Money is Not Speech. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:03 am
According to F&C, Okotoks' conduct had caused substantial confusion among members of the public and people involved in the property business. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:01 am
According to F&C, Okotoks' conduct had caused substantial confusion among members of the public and people involved in the property business. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Nat
  Until, that is, the 1980s, when the backlash by the wrongdoers’ lobby and their ever profitable insurance company bell-ringers intensified their attacks. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 1:41 am by J
 *although given the decision in James v UK (1986) 8 EHRR 123 – Leasehold Reform Act 1968 compatible – and the more generous valuation basis, I doubt it. [read post]