Search for: "People v. Rand"
Results 81 - 100
of 198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2012, 3:19 pm
Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown in Hettinga v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Lawson is a libertarian devotee of Ayn Rand, who, to be sure, figures in Kersch's book. [read post]
29 May 2011, 3:05 pm
Discrimination is nothing more than preferring some things or people over others. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 5:21 pm
Supreme Court finally issued its decision in Bilski v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:54 pm
For example, in U.S. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 12:17 pm
And an excessive royalty isn't less excessive just because some people accept it. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 12:12 pm
Brady v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm
Ford Professor of Dispute Resolution I first met Justice O’Connor when I was still at RAND and the RAND Vice-President arranged for her to speak to me about our research on tort litigation. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 4:02 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Bilski v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am
Andy Wang noted that the Supreme Court asked for the views of the Solicitor General in Samantar v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:42 am
Most of Apple's hearing revolved around its tax practices, the interests of shareholders versus those of the American people, and the enormous amount of cash owned by Apple oversea (more than US$ 100 billion). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 9:56 am
The perennially reasonable Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) said in a written statement: “Just because a couple people on the Supreme Court declare something to be ‘constitutional’ does not make it so. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
Jurata provided a quick overview of the FTC v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm
They assumed that the meaning of the Commerce Clause in NFIB v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 9:30 pm
In light of anticipated litigation, Pentagon lawyers should re-familiarize themselves with Witt v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:53 am
AFSCME, arguing that “compelling people to give money, by itself, is not a First Amendment problem but is rather akin to taxation. [read post]
4 May 2017, 5:45 pm
We are instead currently governed by people who make Aaron Burr look admirable. [read post]
