Search for: "People v. Render" Results 81 - 100 of 5,228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Katherine Yon Ebright
Both when enacted and in subsequent litigation, the Alien Enemies Act’s proponents defended its constitutionality on the ground that the “rules of war under the laws of nations” rendered a belligerent’s citizens “liable to be treated as prisoners of war” and thus subject to detention or deportation. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:53 am by Guest Contributor
Circuit is considering direct challenges to the Good Neighbor Rule (Utah v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
The next text prompt the author entered, “painting of the Brooklyn Bridge in winter in the style of Andy Warhol” added some pastel oranges and pinks reminiscent of a Warhol-color palette, and rendered the Brooklyn Bridge scenes with loose, streaking marks as if it had been drawn by hand. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post,  The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).Edward A. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
That could also address some of the Article III standing issues I’ve been encouraging people to raise. [read post]
  Military action under these circumstances at this time in Rafah will render such assistance and services simultaneously more urgently needed and less available. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:12 am by Marcel Pemsel
The sign will either be understood as an indication that the goods subject to the services are souvenirs, an indication of the theme of the goods or the place where the services are rendered (namely near the Cologne Cathedral). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:32 am by Nathan Dorn
On the one hand, he realized that how people perceive right and wrong can and does change from place to place and from age to age. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ct. 1731, 1755 (2020) (Alito, J., dissenting) (statutory words “mean what they conveyed to reasonable people at the time they were written” (citation omitted)); Kisor v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Part 2 identifies the offices people have held that required oaths that render them ineligible if they thereafter engaged in insurrection or rebellion. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:32 pm by Dennis Crouch
This principle was established in Thaler v. [read post]