Search for: "People v. Self (1993)" Results 81 - 100 of 374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 Written in what we might call the Rodney King era (this was also the threshold of the Clinton era, characterized by Democratic efforts at religious conciliation and a more general tacking to the right), these essays didn’t just talk about the possibility of overcoming the divide between secularists and religious believers; they performed the act of trying to bridge conflicting faiths that Sandy dissected and extolled.[5] Writing in a self-reflective and sometimes… [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 11:24 am by Tian Lu
However, because fan fiction is created and consumed within a group of like-minded people, the influence of such potential infringement is largely self-contained. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:23 am
Ehly, 317 Or. 66, 854 P.2d 421 (Oregon Supreme Court 1993). [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 10:18 pm by Josh Blackman
S. 43, 53 (1993) (due process generally requires a hearing). [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:55 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This statement was cited favourable by the Court in 1993 in R. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 10:43 am
Referring to Medellin and his 1993 crime, Scheidegger said: “The controversy over a treaty signed 45 years ago has delayed justice in this case, which involves a brutal, remorseless murderer. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The use of the phrase "as may be provided by law" is not restrictive and suggests that the Supreme Court possesses the self-executing authority to remove cases to itself (see People v Levandowski, 190 Misc 2d 738 [Sup Ct, Rensselaer County 2002]). [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:11 pm by Michael Oykhman
” It may be “stored” even if the accused places them temporarily out of sight with the intention of retrieving them later… To meet the third criterion (the accused acted “in a careless manner or without reasonable precautions for the safety of other persons”), the Crown must show that the accused acted in a way which caused a risk to people or property (see: R v Batty, 2014 ONCA 620 (CanLII)). [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Finally, there is RFRA, federal legislation which was enacted in 1993, with overwhelming bipartisan support, in response to a Supreme Court ruling—Employment Division v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of  section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10  Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]