Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Stevens)" Results 81 - 100 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2011, 6:23 pm by royblack
Just two months before Al-Kidd, on March 29, 2011, the Supreme Court ruled in Connick v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Moreover, applying the Supreme Court’s 1995 opinion in Wyoming v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Pam KarlanRick Hills's recent post over at Prawfsblawg on the Supreme Court's decision in Riley v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
It’s time to acknowledge and celebrate the superiority of Western Civilization. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:21 pm by Law Lady
The San Luis Obispo County Superior Court jury awarded $53 million in future medical expenses for Jennifer and Andrew Blunt's daughter Sofia, in addition to $21.5 million in damages for emotional distress, future lost wages and noneconomic damages. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
A town of about 40,000 people, it is the county seat for Luzerne, in the northeast part of the state. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm by David Kopel
The Heller Court  did not attempt to adjudicate the controversy; instead, the Court simply pointed to the choices made by the American people. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:14 pm
I have discussed the reform with members of Congress and it has been debated in prior years.2004... 2002... this is post-Bush v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:02 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
As the Pennsylvania Superior Court said years ago, “The Crimes Code nowhere defines this duty,” Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm by John Buhl
Supreme Court will hear arguments in South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 2:06 pm
  But my curmudgeonly fears were laid to rest earlier this week when the Supreme Court decided Carey v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  In the case of all natural rights, the people understood that the government’s role was to preserve natural rights against interference from private actors and to restrain the exercise of these natural rights in circumstances where the people’s representatives in the legislature had determined that such restraint was for the public good. [read post]