Search for: "People v. Turley" Results 81 - 100 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2010, 8:35 am by Big Tent Democrat
GRAHAM: So America needs to get ready for this proposition that some people are going to be detained as enemy combatants, not criminals. [read post]
29 May 2009, 10:02 am
As an example of Realist interpretation, consider Justice Cardozo's decision in Steward Machine v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:50 pm by Adam Schlossman
In non-nomination news: The cross in the Mojave dessert that was at the center of the recent Supreme Court decision in Salazar v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
When the censorship system was recently put before the Supreme Court in Murthy v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 November 2019 (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) Turley v Unite the Union, heard 11 to 15 and 19 November 2019 (Nicklin J) Kirkegaard v Smith, heard 26 November 2019 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Turley v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Turley v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Instagram has announced it will remove the number of “likes” visible from posts in the U.S. in an attempt to decrease competitive pressure between people, and promote safety and mental health. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
On 19 December 2019 Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of Turley v Unite the Union [2019] EWHC 3547 (QB), (heard 11 to 15 and 19 November 2019). [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On the 6 December 2016 Channel 4 News has issued an apology after a subtitling error wrongly claimed Boris Johnson had discussed whether “people of colour” should be allowed into the UK, in reality, Johnson said he was in favour of having “people of talent” come to the UK, and did not discuss race. [read post]