Search for: "People v. Washington (1996)"
Results 81 - 100
of 362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2010, 2:58 am
To state a CPA claim, a person must show that the unfair or deceptive act affected the people of the state of Washington. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
According to a Supreme Court case we read (which we didn’t bother to verify), those states are: Connecticut, Louisiana, Michigan, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and Washington. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:12 am
” United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
Street v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am
State, 343 Md. 720, 737 (1996). [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 3:58 am
Dretke, and Snyder v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1996.Ungar, Sanford J. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Washington standard was unreasonable. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
These security services are directly responsible for the repression of the Cuban people. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:07 pm
There are plenty of self-serving people and organizations around Washington. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:11 am
Clark of Washington. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:20 pm
But people should no longer depend on the ACLU to defend what they preach (especially at a cost), if it disapproves of what they practice. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 2:40 pm
And of course, more encryption technology is more readily available today than it was in 1996. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
And of course, more encryption technology is more readily available today than it was in 1996. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
” In NASA v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
” In NASA v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996), was not mentioned at all. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
King-Washington v. [read post]
