Search for: "People v. Waxman"
Results 81 - 100
of 171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2013, 11:43 am
The decision is a curious one, given the complexity of the Hatch-Waxman regime and the underlying exclusive rights of the patent owner. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
He described the circuit split leading to FTC v Actavis currently pending in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:51 am
People are talking about independent invention as a defense under the doctrine of equivalents. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am
The invalidation may have some serious repercussions on the ongoing Indian case ( BMS v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm
What will happen in the Warman v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:30 am
District Court Judge Neil Wake, and WilmerHale partner Seth Waxman. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:43 am
Some people say this means that patent litigation is essentially a game of chance these days, but it doesn’t have to be. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
In Arakelian v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:29 pm
EPA; American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:29 pm
EPA; American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 6:43 am
Related posts: Mayo v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm
But even if it's just treated as symbolic expression, it is still constitutionally protected, as cases such as Texas v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:46 pm
On Tuesday an FACDL team (Ben Waxman and Maggie Arias) argue for the retroactive application of Padilla before the Florida Supreme Court in Diaz v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:05 pm
[See here for interesting commentary from Matt Waxman, by the way]. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
All three of these Reagan justices were in the majority in Bush v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm
FEC, U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
Well, certainly people noticed it. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
At the end of the hour of argument in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
