Search for: "People v. White (1988)"
Results 81 - 100
of 303
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2015, 7:32 am
In Natal, by 1988, 90% of the coastline was set aside exclusively for whites. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am
See Glik v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
., told Bell Rainey commented to her that he thought she had `”messed” with some nasty people’ and suggested that he otherwise would have, in S.S.'s words, `turn[ed][her] back “straight” from being “gay. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
However, in Knowsley v White, Lord Neuberger had taken the view, albeit obiter, that it was entirely possible for an alternative interpretation of s.82(2) to be made, such that the date the tenancy ended was the date 'on which the tenant was to give up possession', i.e. on enforcement, bringing it into line with the interpretation of Housing Act 1988 for assured tenants in that case. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
However, in Knowsley v White, Lord Neuberger had taken the view, albeit obiter, that it was entirely possible for an alternative interpretation of s.82(2) to be made, such that the date the tenancy ended was the date 'on which the tenant was to give up possession', i.e. on enforcement, bringing it into line with the interpretation of Housing Act 1988 for assured tenants in that case. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 10:01 am
See, e.g., Stevens v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm
Kress & Co., she represented a white teacher who had been arrested after trying to dine with six Black students at a segregated Mississippi lunch counter. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
The Statute Restricts Conduct Only When It Is Accompanied by Speech That Conveys a Certain Message Utah bigamy law does not ban married people from having sex with people other than their spouses.[2] It does not ban married people from living with extramarital romantic partners. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:02 pm
Rev. 297, 330-31 (1988). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
On 4 October 2011 the Court of Justice duly delivered its ruling in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton and Derek Owen and C-429/08 Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (see IPKat post here), following which Mr Justice Kitchin -- having metaphorically vanished as Gandalf… [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
Housing Authority (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 635 (Hanif),[1] Hamilton argued that because only the amounts paid by plaintiff and her insurer could be recovered, the larger amounts billed by the providers were irrelevant and should be excluded. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 1:09 pm
She at first said a long-haired white man was the perpetrator before identifying a short-haired Hispanic man (Mr. [read post]
9 May 2015, 12:22 pm
Florida Airlines, 449 So.2d 881 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 456 So.2d 1181 (Fla. 1984); White v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 8:03 am
Morgentaler, [1988] 1 SCR 30, for instance. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Sept. 10, 2003); White v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm
Or does it also prohibit racial or sales policies that have a negative impact on people with the protected characteristics? [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Nov. 15, 2004); White v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:31 am
Yet the Senate is moving slowly, and the White House and the Justice Department have remained largely quiet. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
Bell Hill Vineyards, LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of STENTALLOY for alloys used to make medical devices: In re Metalwerks PMD, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Boston Red Sox - Red Sox and White Sox oppose e.SOX for cellphone sleeves: Boston Red Sox Baseball Club Limited Partnership and Chicago White Sox, Ltd. v. [read post]
