Search for: "Peter M. Friedman" Results 81 - 100 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2010, 5:16 pm by Ilya Somin
So I’m hardly an uncritical cheerleader for Jeff’s arguments, or he for mine. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 5:46 pm by Erik Gerding
(For an interesting comparative study of the intersection of politics and corporate governance, see Peter A. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 7:57 am by AdamSmith1776
Levy, Managing Partner, Jenner & Block; Jon Lindsey, Managing Partner, New York, Major, Lindsey & Africa; Francis M. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:22 pm by Angel Reyes
I find Peter's admonition fits almost everyone in life's second half. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm by admin
— Lisa Friedman, Climatewire in The New York Times, December 17, 2009 Developing countries have formed a powerful interest bloc in climate talks over the years, fighting collectively for the rights of poor nations. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am by smtaber
— Lisa Friedman, Climatewire in The New York Times, December 17, 2009 Developing countries have formed a powerful interest bloc in climate talks over the years, fighting collectively for the rights of poor nations. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 12:10 am
And I could explain to you how being offside in soccer is akin to being offside in hockey, and doing so would help you understand the common purposes of the 2 rules (to avoid cherry picking), but when I'm arguing about being offside in soccer I better not be using rules and jargon from ice hockey. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
Investment brokerage m. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
Professor Alan Scott Rau Professor Peter Friedman Rick Freeman We would like you to celebrate with us by leaving a reply on this post! [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:26 pm
Ron Friedman offers some theories on why the "most profitable law firms" don't blog - [bit.ly] Check out the new The Kennedy-Mighell Report Podcast on the Legal Talk Network. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:19 am
Given that he is invested in his belief the law’s 4-part test to determine fair use is an utterly arbitrary one that in every case can as easily support one position as another, Zaretsky thinks I’m wrong. [read post]