Search for: "Petition of Harrington"
Results 81 - 100
of 142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
_____________________________/ ORDER THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of Mackle Vincent Shelton’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:21 pm
On November 3, 2011, that Petition was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm
Court of Appeals Rejects Husbands Argument That Intention to Equally Divide Marital Estate Was Frustrated Because Both Parties Operated under "Mistake" or Misconception as to Existence of a Legitimate Madoff Investment Account In Simkin v Blank, --- N.E.2d ----, 2012 WL 1080295 (N.Y.) [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:58 am
Court of Appeals Rejects Husbands Argument That Intention to Equally Divide Marital Estate Was Frustrated Because Both Parties Operated under "Mistake" or Misconception as to Existence of a Legitimate Madoff Investment Account … [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:24 pm
Martinez then had 45 days to file a pro se petition in order to keep the collateral proceeding alive. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:25 am
As I discussed in this post, in its decision last year in Harrington v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:54 am
Greene then petitioned for review by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, and while his petition for review was pending, the U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:44 pm
Post-Conviction Remedies Harrington v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:14 pm
”); Harrington v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court Detention of D.F.F.: The Court held that the Superior Court Mental Proceeding Rule 1.3, which provides involuntary commitment proceedings “shall not be open to the public, unless the person who is the subject of the proceedings or his attorney files with the court a written request that the proceedings be public,” violates the right… [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:06 am
Harrington, No. 06-15614 (en banc per curiam).On remand from the Supremes after the 9th had reversed for IAC for failing to call forensic experts to explain evidence, the 9th concludes that the petitioner's other claims also fail. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:06 pm
Subsequently, the Court fired a torpedo amidships in Harrington v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:37 pm
Its successive petition bar stands on similar ground. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:39 am
The court acknowledged Harrington v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:35 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in the case of Harrington v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:27 pm
Moore & Harrington v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 10:53 am
According to one study tracking the nearly 20,000 petitions filed in 2004, the success rate at the district court level was about 2%. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Criminal law -- Habeas corpus -- Counsel -- Ineffectiveness -- Section 2254(d), which, as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, limits the availability of federal habeas relief for claims previously “adjudicated on the merits” in state court proceedings, applies to petition for federal habeas relief when state court's order denying relief is unaccompanied by an opinion explaining the court's reasoning -- Petitioner was not entitled to the habeas… [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:58 pm
Today, in this post, I’ll focus on what the Court had to say about habeas law in one of the decisions, Harrington v. [read post]
