Search for: "Phillips v. Doe et al"
Results 81 - 100
of 198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
11 years later, Scallan et al. have produced "Sons of Mead," which include substantial improvements to the methods used by Mead et al. and to the quality and timeliness of data (1,2). [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:25 am
The case is Dunn et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
PIONEER MEDICAL GROUP, INC., et. al, The Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act affords certain protections to elders and dependent adults. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Independent Living Center, et al. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:23 am
Hennessey et al. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:53 am
Jenkins, et al v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
Phillips of the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:58 am
Bd., et al, No. 15-2056, slip op. (4th Cir., Apr. 19, 2016). [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Alderwoods Group, Inc., et al., No. 06-1641. [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:42 am
Astoria Bank, et al. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
Jordan, et al. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:04 pm
Ltd. et al., 1939 CanLII 276 (UK JCPC), a Privy Council decision from the legendary Lord Wright that involved alleged copyright infringement in Canada. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 9:32 pm
July 9, 2008); Iovate Health Sciences Inc. et al v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
Lenovo International, et. al. / No, DED Brigham and Women’s Hospital Inc. et al v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Thus, petitioner has failed to prove that the distribution of these stickers affected the outcome of the budget vote (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeal of Crawford, et al., 47 id. 413, Decision No. 15,739; Appeal of Holliday, 42 id. 242, Decision No. 14,840). [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Thus, petitioner has failed to prove that the distribution of these stickers affected the outcome of the budget vote (Appeal of Casey-Tomasi, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,301; Appeal of Crawford, et al., 47 id. 413, Decision No. 15,739; Appeal of Holliday, 42 id. 242, Decision No. 14,840). [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 2:36 pm
If it does, the recapture rule bars the claim. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
0551 CLAIRE STANARD PHILLIPS v. [read post]
