Search for: "Picking v. STATE FINANCE CORPORATION"
Results 81 - 100
of 161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Indeed, Eugene V. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
You may recall that Mark Lutz is — according to him and the other Prendarasts — formerly a paralegal for Steele and Hansmeier, a thoroughly useless "corporate representative," an alleged unpaid "manager" or "CEO" of Prenda Law entity AF Holdings. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 1:27 pm
” Over the years, there have been periodic signs of hope; a pre-engineering magnet program focused heavily on the sciences and partially financed by corporate sponsors, a Dunbar graduate becoming a Stanford graduate, and most recently, the track coach who will pick up girls at home as early as 3:30am to get them to practice and who can point to every girl in a team photo and name where she is in college. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 3:01 pm
Most recently, a federal court in Rushton v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm
Similar to campaign finance: restricting money ends up restricting speech. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:27 am
Conte v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm
Noteworthy costs awards were recently released in Middlesex Condominium Corporation No. 232 v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:50 am
Jonathan Macey is the Sam Harris Professor of Corporate Law, Securities Law and Corporate Finance at Yale Law School. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
Last week, I focused on how the United States' unreasonably high corporate taxes can hinder American companies' global competitiveness, and Hostess Brands' monthly operating report (required for bankruptcy proceedings) shows at page 15 that the beleaguered company was/is responsible for not only state, local and federal corporate income taxes, but also millions of dollars in other taxes, including (i) Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA); (ii) Federal… [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:45 am
Thanks to a court decision earlier this month, in Alf Naman Real Estate Advisors, LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:45 am
Thanks to a court decision earlier this month, in Alf Naman Real Estate Advisors, LLC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Shiftan In Shiftan v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Shiftan In Shiftan v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:59 pm
Constitutional Law: Kelo v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:41 am
Iqbal and Wal-Mart v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:59 am
The Missouri Court of Appeal’s decision in Teasdale & Associates v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:33 am
Bullock, the challenge to the Montana Supreme Court ruling upholding a statute that bans corporate spending in state elections. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:14 pm
The case is American Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 3:05 pm
In that ruling, the Court declared that the mere fact that corporations and unions spend heavily on campaigns does not amount to the kind of political corruption that could be curbed with campaign finance laws. [read post]
