Search for: "Picking v. STATE FINANCE CORPORATION" Results 81 - 100 of 166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2014, 9:18 am
Working through an interpreter, I was asked to give a brief description of campaign finance law in the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:18 am
This week, however, the FCC's bad news was followed very quickly by the Supreme Court's decision today in McCutcheon v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:06 am by Peter Mahler
Indeed, the very definition of Promote states that it is “determined under Sections 6.1 (a)(iii)-(v). [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:50 am by Cicely Wilson
The court held that classifications based on sexual orientation were subject to a heightened scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm by Ken White
You may recall that Mark Lutz is — according to him and the other Prendarasts — formerly a paralegal for Steele and Hansmeier, a thoroughly useless "corporate representative," an alleged unpaid "manager" or "CEO" of Prenda Law entity AF Holdings. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 1:27 pm by Jeffrey Tignor
” Over the years, there have been periodic signs of hope; a pre-engineering magnet program focused heavily on the sciences and partially financed by corporate sponsors, a Dunbar graduate becoming a Stanford graduate, and most recently, the track coach who will pick up girls at home as early as 3:30am to get them to practice and who can point to every girl in a team photo and name where she is in college. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Similar to campaign finance: restricting money ends up restricting speech. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm by Chris Jaglowitz
Noteworthy costs awards were recently released in Middlesex Condominium Corporation No. 232 v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:50 am by Jonathan Macey
Jonathan Macey is the Sam Harris Professor of Corporate Law, Securities Law and Corporate Finance at Yale Law School. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
Last week, I focused on how the United States' unreasonably high corporate taxes can hinder American companies' global competitiveness, and Hostess Brands' monthly operating report (required for bankruptcy proceedings) shows at page 15 that the beleaguered company was/is responsible for not only state, local and federal corporate income taxes, but also millions of dollars in other taxes, including (i) Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA); (ii) Federal… [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
Thanks to a court decision earlier this month, in Alf Naman Real Estate Advisors, LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
Thanks to a court decision earlier this month, in Alf Naman Real Estate Advisors, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:59 pm by TDot
Constitutional Law: Kelo v. [read post]