Search for: "Pitts v. Pitts"
Results 81 - 100
of 464
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2019, 2:41 pm
Pitts raises a single issue on appeal: whether the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:45 am
The decisionThe Board first noted that for a sign to possess distinctive character, it must serve to identify the goods and services in respect of which registration is sought as originating from a particular undertaking, and thus to distinguish those goods and services from those of other undertakings (C-473/01 P, Procter & Gamble v OHIM). [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:07 am
Co. of Pitt., 257 F.3d 484, 493 (6th Cir. 2001). [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 8:11 am
"Pitt Law Dean Amy Wildermuth is one of the panelists who will be speaking. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm
In State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 6:04 pm
But after the court of appeals held in State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm
John Reed Stark Earlier this week, media reports circulated that this past spring Google had exposed the private data of thousands of the Google+ social network users and then opted not to disclose the issue, in part because of concerns that doing so would draw regulatory scrutiny and cause reputational damage. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm
The Government offers no meaningful distinction between this case and Pitt News. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:54 am
See State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 8:14 pm
While at the time perhaps an inconsequential procedural ruling, Walcot v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 8:12 pm
While at the time perhaps an inconsequential procedural ruling, Walcot v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:31 pm
Pitts, each of which loosened the standard for ending court supervision of formerly de jure segregated school districts. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:59 pm
Is cited in the following article: Cole Antolak, Airport Security: Over-Reaching New Heights, 18 Pitt. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:31 am
I discussed earlier Pitt-Lundy battles in the 2013 version of my CLE. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:31 am
I discussed earlier Pitt-Lundy battles in the 2013 version of my CLE. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 7:06 am
Does 1-100, 18-cv-01754, Northern District of Illinois; Samuel v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am
John Reed Stark As I noted in a post at the time, on February 20, 2018, the SEC issued its guidance for cybersecurity-related disclosures. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 2:38 am
Larry Pitt Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
claiming to provide services then referring out can be false advertising, but P must still show harm
26 Feb 2018, 5:26 am
Larry Pitt & Associates v. [read post]
