Search for: "Plant v. Commonwealth"
Results 81 - 100
of 105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
Among them is the Kalamazoo River, which was tainted for decades with industrial waste from paper mills and other manufacturing plants. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 5:50 pm
In Kilmer v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:23 am
The case is MFS, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
Environmental Protection Agency and the Commonwealth of Virginia. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
In the complaint, Duggan Family Partnership alleged that pollutants from the city’s wastewater treatment plant have contaminated water on the plantation, the Ocmulgee River, Palmetto Creek and Turkey Creek, according to the suit, filed in federal court June 8, 2009. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
— Imelda V. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
That means elevating buildings, making taller and stronger dams and seawalls, rerouting water systems, restricting certain developments, changing farming practices, and ultimately moving people, plants, and animals out of harm’s way. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 8:16 pm
What actually set the stage for the Appeals Court to make this ruling, was a ruling handed down in 2008 by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, in a criminal case, Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 8:16 pm
What actually set the stage for the Appeals Court to make this ruling, was a ruling handed down in 2008 by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, in a criminal case, Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
I have linked each company name to its corresponding record at the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office (or Secretary of the Commonwealth - whatever). [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:48 am
Commonwealth Real Estate Svcs. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 7:40 pm
Further, the Court cited Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:26 pm
A recent decision by the Commonwealth Court of PA, The Bullen Companies v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
(Techdirt) India Warner loses Hari Puttar case before Delhi High Court for delay in taking action and suppression of material facts (SPICY IP) (IPKat) (Techdirt) (SPICY IP) (Innovationpartners) Delay in evidence suffocates trade mark opposition: Pidilite Industries Limited v Registrar of Trademarks (International Law Office) Delhi High Court rules in Wipro's favour in its trade mark infringement action against local Delhi company (RelatIP) Delhi High Court: Mattel… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 10:08 am
Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 4:15 am
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. [read post]
