Search for: "Post v. Duffy" Results 81 - 100 of 277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2018, 11:36 am by Workplace Prof
Thanks to Christine Duffy (Senior Staff Attorney, ProBono Partnership) who sent along news that the Sixth Circuit handed down its opinion in EEOC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC; Federalist Society panel video with Gregory Dolin, John Duffy, Arti Ray, and Robert Greene Sterne; Jeffri Kaminski, WLF] Collins v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
New Matilda has a piece concerning the Duffy v Google Inc case entitled “Google not feeling so lucky over Australian Defamation case”. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
This post was originally published in the Gazette of Law and Journalism, Australia’s leading online media law publication. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Google v Equustek and Duffy cases Is Google, the operator of the world’s most popular search engine, a publisher entitled to the constitutional protections accorded to publishers of free speech? [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
There were also press releases from Impress and Hacked Off about the decision and Brian Cathcart had a post about the case. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  We had a post on the statements made in the MGN litigation and we have already dealt with the statement in open court [pdf[ in Hurst v NGN. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 6:33 am by INFORRM
Dr Duffy also created a chat group on yahoo.com under the name “kasambavictims” and posted its internet address on the Ripoff Report website. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal determined autocomplete predictions were incapable of being defamatory, based on Justice Malcolm Blue’s decision in Duffy v Google. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Other actions: * Grattan v Porter – $170,000 after the defendant telephoned a school alleging sexual misconduct, Queensland. * Dr Janice Duffy v Google Inc – $100,000 following search results and hyperlinks suggesting she was a “psychic stalker”, SA. * Douglas v McLernon – $700,000 to three Perth businessmen defamed on the internet, WA. * Dodds v McDonald – a Queensland barrister’s website accused the Victorian… [read post]