Search for: "Power-One Inc. v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 3,314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
United States Jaycees (1984) 468 U.S. 609, 629, 104 S.Ct. 3244, 82 L.Ed.2d 462. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Please note that these figures include only federal court securities suit filings; the numbers do not include securities class action lawsuits filed in state court. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The second part of this year yielded several cases addressing instances of workplace violence, including one case involving a third-party attack and another an assault by a co-worker. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm by Thomas James
They do not extend to infringement occurring solely outside of the United States, even if consumer confusion occurs in the United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am by Alessandro Cerri
 The Court of Appeal explained that, although it was free to depart from "retained EU case law", it can only do so on the same basis as the Supreme Court can depart from one of its own precedents, which is a power to be exercised with "great caution" (see Horton v Sadler [2006] UKHL 27). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm by CFM Admin
State-registered advisers need to examine their states’ regulations to determine who constitutes a “client. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Author
Recently, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:42 am by centerforartlaw
However, in recent years, the legality of murals in the United States is not without its challenges, especially with regards to murals made by and for minority groups. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
A decision by a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit late last month concerning Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), in Arkansas State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]