Search for: "Price v. Age, Ltd."
Results 81 - 100
of 243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
Sys. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Hitachi, LTD. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 4:12 am
Second development Following hot on the heels of the Law Commission report and, in many respects, making the point that there is very little protection against event fees is Burrell and others v Helical (Bramshott Place) Ltd [2015] EWHC 3727 (Ch). [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
Also in the US, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that watchmaker Omega's attempt to use copyright laws to block the sale of Omega watches at discounted prices by Costco will just not work - because of the 'first sale' doctrine' - and that Omega's action was also a misuse of copyright. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
Last week in the Courts On 26 October 2015, Warby J heard the appeals in the cases of Richardson v Facebook and Richardson v Google UK Ltd. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 12:48 pm
CANADA (AG) Copyright Infringement [Actions] RE T-1674-14 1395804 ONTARIO LTD. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 3:26 am
He was then aged 32. [read post]
8 May 2015, 4:42 am
(Omega AG) (Omega Ltd.) v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
Never too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C More | Brown epilators in Albania | More… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:50 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C… [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
The previous week's Katposts lined up like this:* It's not over till the Pink Lady sues: crunch time for apple appeal and applicationJeremy reports on Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM, Carolus C. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 10:03 pm
See Springer Ranch, Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
e-Alert http://t.co/Z14rKpVwPG -> Eng.CA sends case back to CJEU ITV Broadcasting Ltd & Ors v TVCatchup Ltd & Ors [2015] EWCA Civ 204 http://t.co/frClUO3ttD -> Facebook, New York Times deal could change the news biz http://t.co/1Drjkrl2pF -> The B.C. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:42 am
Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 11:26 am
RYANAIR LTD V PR AVIATION The CJEU case involved PR Aviation which operates a price-comparison website for low-cost airlines. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:30 am
So busy, always something more to read ...When this Kat first spotted the very important ruling in Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch), [explanation: Cartier was the first named claimant, but the three claimants are collectively referred to as 'Richemont', which owned the others] a decision of Mr Justice Arnold on 17 October 2014, he posted a breaking news item and fully intended to… [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:41 am
– Nampa Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
This post summarises the issues of drug prices and access to medicines, which received the most comments from readers of the previous posts. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 7:32 am
The suit requests unspecified damages (Sonterra Master Capital Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
