Search for: "Price v. Mann"
Results 81 - 100
of 112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2012, 10:04 am
Adler, Bernard Petrie Professor of Law and Business and Associate Dean for Information Systems and Technology, New York University School of Law Panel V. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:29 pm
Selling less means higher prices. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:41 am
But sometimes such trading creates net social benefits, as in Dirks v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:51 am
: "In Praise of ProPublica" pjblack.me/KEZsq4 "A Commencement Speech with a Smooch" from andy samberg pjblack.me/JBb7KR #highered facebook releases a dedicated camera iphone app: "Facebook Releases Instagram Clone" pjblack.me/JB7HYF "The Oz v academics: Manne, universities hit back" pjblack.me/JB7ogA #highered #auspol #lwb480 #kkb175 an excellent post about #eurovision, gay rights… [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 6:57 am
Mann, 22 Va. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
Ronald Mann reports on Tuesday’s arguments in Freeman v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 12:04 pm
In Whited v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
Indeed, the issue may go beyond a simple pricing dispute. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:50 am
Indeed, the issue may go beyond a simple pricing dispute. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 10:40 am
Manne & Joshua D. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 1:52 pm
” Gravel v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:17 am
Schotland (1967), ‘Unsafe At Any Price: A Reply to Manne, Insider Trading and the Stock Market’ 11. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:26 am
In LaPoint v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:15 am
The named plaintiffs in the suit, Johnson v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 1:35 am
” This project is inspired by the DC Circuit’s opinion in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:26 pm
Search ads v. other online ads. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:13 am
Mann ~~~ OMG Martin – thank you – I cried in laughter – One of the greatest things in life, is to be understood. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 9:17 pm
The whole idea that they are “price theorists,” when price theory refers to the neoclassical model of perfect competition, is silly. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Aurora rejected that offer, and an attorney in Hall’slaw office proposed a sale price of $425,000, which would have meant a loss to thelender of about $340,000.It is undisputed that on June 18, 2009, Aurora recorded a notice of default.The notice of default used this (obviously form) language: “The Beneficiary or itsdesignated agent declares that it has contacted the borrower, tried with due diligence tocontact the borrower as required by California Civil Code section 2923.5, or… [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Supreme Court, January 20, 2010 Wood v. [read post]
