Search for: "Price v. Revell" Results 81 - 100 of 223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” The 1969 Supreme Court decision in Powell v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 10:43 pm by Florian Mueller
Its stock price still continued to go up for a while (it more than doubled from that point, and it's still far above the fall 2011 level). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am by JB
Assange did not have to rely on the facilities of a major newspaper to publish his revelations. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:44 am by Christine Hurt
  The May 2011 case has to allege that price drops on specific dates in March and April were the result of revelations of truth. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the wake of these revelations, one question is whether the SEC will look into these circumstances. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 5:53 am
Accordingly, there is no mechanism for a misstatement in a mutual fund's prospectus to affect a fund share's price and, therefore, there is no mechanism for a misstatement or its revelation to cause a plaintiff's losses. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 8:08 am by Kevin LaCroix
Upon revelation of the attack, the company’s share price declined nearly 40%. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 1:29 am
” The district court said it could not make “the unreasonable inference that a public revelation caused a price drop three months later. [read post]
1 May 2022, 5:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
”) Given the minimal size of the share price decline after the supposed “revelations,” the plaintiff will face significant hurdles showing materiality and loss causation. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 10:15 pm
  It's a high price to pay for a legal fiction.The answer seems to be found in the most basic aspect of Rivera v. [read post]