Search for: "Price v. Stewart" Results 81 - 100 of 200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Mark Murakami
This session alone will be worth the price of admission. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:57 am by Benjamin Bissell
Although the sides agree on the price for Russian gas, the amount to be bought, and the repayment by Kiev of unpaid bills, Moscow is demanding more assurances that Kiev can produce $1.6 billion “up front” for gas deliveries. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:29 am by Eric M. Fraser
Stewart Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart faced few questions about the correctness of the outcome in this case. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by Joy Waltemath
Several provisions of the proposed settlement were troubling, and “their collective presence is a red-flag for potential collusion which weighs against granting approval,” the court wrote (Stewart v USA Tank Sales and Erection Co, Inc, March 4, 2014, Kays, G). [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 8:43 am by Laura H. Juillet
In the recent case of Lorne Stewart plc v Hyde and others, the EAT made clear that it is important not to get side-tracked by the details of formal written contracts which are in place between the parties before and after a potential TUPE transfer, if such details do not reflect reality. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Becomes Canada’s Longest-Serving Chief Justice http://t.co/WxpKIS9o3n -> Life on the Social Media Front Line: The legal and ethical challenges facing Online Community Managers http://t.co/YD8WpEJJZj -> eBay Not Liable for Technical Glitch When Seller Doesn't Set Reserve Price — D'Agostino v. eBay http://t.co/2epESgQmu0 -> Court Upholds Doocing For Snarky Facebook Post — Rodriquez v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Finally:  Mondaq has a very nice summary of the Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in Avalon Legal Information Svcs. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm by David Cheifetz
 'They're at $42.75 and damn the torpedoes,' said one of the sources.[1] [12] Stewart, on cross-examination, indicated that the “high-level” source at BCE was privy to the BCE board negotiating position and that the source consented to being identified as being with BCE. [13] The appellant claims that on the trading day following the publication of the article, the price of BCE shares fell 3.3% and the market price of BCE call options fell precipitously. [read post]