Search for: "Price v. United States Government et al" Results 81 - 100 of 333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
"[18] Significantly, anti-trust laws do not necessarily guarantee low prices, only the conditions that lead to them.[19]  This distinction is intentional; the United States Supreme Court has recognized that while it may set the circumstances for achieving a fair price, the workings of a liberal market are better able to determine the fair price itself.[20]  While anti-trust laws prohibit fixing maximum prices, the entire… [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Stephen Jenei
Brief for the American Civil Liberties Union  Brief for AARP and the Public Patent Foundation Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party Brief for the International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Brief for the United States of America  Brief for Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et al. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am by Christa Culver
Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief of Tata Steel IJmuiden BV in oppositionBrief of the United States in oppositionAmicus brief of United Steel et al. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 10:09 am by Ameet Sarpatwari
Government Patent Use to Promote Public Health in the United States: Overcoming Nonpatent Exclusivities. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Pappas et al. (2007) find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[13] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[14] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the… [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:10 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
" I ran across it this morning as I was preparing to teach United States Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:22 am by Dean C. Rowan
McSorley's Old Ale HouseMarilyn A. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 1:12 am by Kouros Sadeghi-Nejad
Attorney’s Office in D.C on May 24th, it was revealed that the individuals in question were charged with “conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States” and causing injury to museum property in violation of Title 40, United States Code, Sections 6303(b)(2): Touching of, or Injuries to, Property. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Cordis Corporation, et al., No. 15-998 Laches: SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag, et al. v. [read post]