Search for: "Price v. United States Government et al"
Results 81 - 100
of 334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) when the state is acting on its own behalf and exercising its discretion in deciding to pursue licensing for a hydroelectric dam project? [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
In City of Oakland et al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
In City of Oakland et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
United States, 290 U.S. 13, 16 (1933)); see United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In another, Logan Alters, et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
United States, the Court of Claims expressed doubt that lost profits could ever be awarded except “after the strictest proof that the patentee would actually have earned and retained those sums in its sales to the Government. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 3:17 am
Brown Univ. in Providence, et al., 5 F.3d 658 (3d Cir. 1993). [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:50 am
BP PLC, et al.). [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm
State Street Corporation, U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 10:31 pm
There is no better example of this interaction than the Shape v Supreme litigation ongoing before Dutch courts, with the most recent decision in this dispute rendered in December 2019 in Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (“SHAPE”) et al v Supreme Site Service GmbH et al (Supreme), COURT OF APPEAL OF ‘s-HERTOGENBOSCH, Case No. 200/216/570/01, Ruling of 10 December 2019 (the ‘CoA Decision’). [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Pappas et al. (2007) find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[13] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[14] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the… [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
City of Seattle, et al. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 1:14 pm
Bechtold, et al. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:50 pm
CMS acknowledges the ruling in American Hospital Association et al. v. [read post]
Can Deals That Do Not Trigger an HSR Filing Raise Antitrust Concerns? Yes, Buyer and Sellers Beware!
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
Twin America, LLC, et. al, Twin America, Coach, and City Sights together were required to pay $7.5 million in disgorgement to remedy alleged violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as well as New York State law, including the Donnelly Act (see Proposed Final Judgment, United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
At stake here is whether the FCC should open a rulemaking to consider changes to program rules governing fiber construction. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 1:55 pm
See United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
§ 6021 et seq. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
The plaintiffs argue that their cases are thus analogous to Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:30 am
See Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
