Search for: "Principle IT Services, Inc. "
Results 81 - 100
of 4,444
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2024, 9:50 am
Grace & Company, Inc., Alvin H. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[Their amicus brief endorses the view that members of state legislatures are officers. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
The ongoing controversy surrounding the artificial intelligence company OpenAI, Inc. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:06 pm
For instance, qualified REITs that meet Internal Revenue Service requirements can deduct distributions paid to shareholders from corporate taxable income, avoiding double taxation. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 11:40 am
Concepts like fiduciary duty are core to building trust between the providers of critical services and those receiving those services. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
For any given product (or service) and geographic market, the HHI is simply the sum of the squares of each market participant’s market share. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 10:34 am
Customers use popular services. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 8:49 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in ITServe Alliance, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
This principle follows from Chevron itself. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
In Seven & i Holdings Co., Ltd. and 7-Eleven, Inc. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 5:24 am
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm
See also Amusement Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am
The previous Cost Corner addressed the applicability of the Cost Principles and their general criteria for determining the allowability of costs. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am
” Cel-Tech Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:37 pm
Investors in Lodging Fund REIT III Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
“Guidelines” simply lack the status of “rules,” and even back in the early 1990s, early Supreme Court precedent in the Chevron line of cases established that mere agency “guidelines,” such as those promulgated by the EEOC, were not deserving of any substantial deference under the Chevron doctrine.[5] Thus, for aficionados of administrative law, the original version of the first section of the statute was pretty clear: Congress wanted the… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
Apparently because of Jackson’s recusal, the court added Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
That interpretation conflicts with First Amendment principles in two constitutionally significant ways. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Reddit, Inc., 2024 WL 150727 (N.D. [read post]
