Search for: "Profit v. Profit"
Results 81 - 100
of 16,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2009, 12:42 am
To be entitled to lost profits damages, the patent owner 'need not negate all possibilities that a purchaser might have bought a different product or might have foregone the purchase altogether.' The relevant standard is whether the patent owner demonstrates a 'reasonable probability that the sale would have been made but for the infringement.' " 3M Innovative Properties Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
An economic framework based on profit maximization often assumes that profits are owed primarily to the owners of capital. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:37 pm
LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:57 pm
A recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in Romag Fasteners, Inc v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:28 pm
Shortly after the start of the Apple v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 6:32 am
In R v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:21 am
In the contentious and closely-watched case of Hobby Lobby, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 6:01 am
Devine v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:49 am
Under state law, hospitals cannot profit from the photocopies. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 10:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 1:15 am
Congress enacted this remedy because it recognized that “it is the design that sells the article” and, because profits attributable to design are often “not apportionable,” “[i]t is expedient that the infringer’s entire profit on the article should be recoverable, as otherwise none of his profit can be recovered. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:42 pm
In WesternGeco LLC v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm
Nessim MezrahiIn the following guest post, Nessim Mezrahi takes a detailed look at the factors driving D&O profitability and the securities class action loss mitigation steps insurers can take to improve profitability. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:44 am
Sys. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:33 pm
The Court’s decision – Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 9:49 am
WesternGeco LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:18 am
The boundaries of this equitable power were tested in connection with not-for-profit entities in a recent Eighth Circuit ruling, In re Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis,[1] whereby the court declined to extend the remedial power to non-profit, non-debtor entities. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 10:31 am
Case citation: BWP Media USA, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:56 pm
As some of you may have heard or read, a preliminary settlement in the case of Sweet v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 4:52 pm
Franchisors seeking such damages should find joy in Meineke Car Care Centers, Inc. v. [read post]
