Search for: "Property Owners v. Mayor"
Results 81 - 100
of 206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2018, 12:04 pm
The court said that taking property from one private owner to give to another private owner in the name of economic development was an acceptable use of eminent domain. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 8:07 am
Wolf v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 8:57 am
On August 6, 2020, in Rose’s 1 LLC, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:00 am
Decision on Appeal On appeal, the Fourth District ruled that the property owner, GSK, had no basis for a Bert Harris Act claim because GSK had never formally applied to develop its property. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 7:10 am
It seems likely that the developer offered the property owners a significant enough amount of money that they felt comfortable selling their property, and thus were satisfied with the outcome such that no claim for an illegal taking was filed. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:56 am
Kansas City, 107 Mo. 83, 17 S.W. 695 (1891) (ruling a lot owner cannot have a city enjoined from erecting a fire engine house on an adjacent lot on the ground that fire bells constitute a nuisance and would depreciate the value of his property). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:39 pm
Imagine, for example, an owner who owns two properties, one of which he wants to develop and the other of which is a public nuisance. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:41 pm
Because it hadn't, the property owner could not get summary judgment on the Klopping claim. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:37 am
In New Jersey, if property is acquired by eminent domain, the owner must receive just compensation at the fair market value of the property. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:24 pm
Huntington Memorial Hospital (1985) 38 Cal.3d 112 (allowing case to proceed against property owner for actions of third-party criminal with no evidence of prior similar incidents). [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:12 am
Should the NY Court of Appeals use this argument for mayoral power to uphold the HAIL Act under Adler v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 2:26 pm
" Michael Shaver, an annexation consultant who has done work for Carmel and several other cities and towns across the state, said the Supreme Court's ruling effectively sets the NOAX deal as an example for other communities and property owners to follow. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:57 am
Vetstein is an experienced Greater Boston landlord tenant attorney who represents rental property owners throughout Boston and Massachusetts. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:11 pm
George Pataki and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:01 am
See River Park, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:06 am
Necessity is a familiar defense to property torts. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 3:03 pm
The buildup affected local residents and business owners who complained that the noxious odors affected their businesses and property values. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:16 pm
Initially, we conclude that the Remonstrators, as property owners in the proposed EDA, are aggrieved for purposes of seeking judicial review of the creation of the EDA. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:37 am
In Board of Aldermen of Cassville v. [read post]
