Search for: "Prophet v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 132
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ken White
Campaign Finance: The Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 1:12 pm by Carl Esbeck
  Just last year Justice Alito reminded us “that the autonomy of religious groups, both here in the United States and abroad, has often served as a shield against oppressive civil laws. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 1:07 pm by RatnerPrestia
Despite the industry’s reliance on this kind of continuation practice, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) recently announced that it is more critically evaluating whether amendments and continu¬ations that claim smaller portions of the originally claimed design would be invalid for lacking “written description” support under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 8:02 am by Ken White
He has that "right" under a United States Supreme Court case called Brady v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Leon Friedman
  His persistence would change the face of criminal justice in the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:02 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia last week heard arguments from a conservative watchdog group seeking to overturn a federal judge's refusal to order the U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:27 am by Eugene Volokh
The United States Supreme Court is regularly subjected to such arguments, especially from amici (including foreign government amici). [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm by Matthew Flinn
Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011 – read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 9:08 am by Barry Barnett
The same paper talked with a bunch of antitrust experts and put what they said about United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:45 pm by Jack Goldsmith
Despite its then shaky legal position, the administration had a legitimate concern with the safety of United States personnel stationed abroad. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:44 am by Yvonne Daly
Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 centred on the constitutionality of s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, as amended by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:53 am by The Book Review Editor
It was this failure of communication and rigid application of the information “wall” that allowed Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi to pass into the United States unhindered and unnoticed; they were both on American Airlines Flight 77 which crashed into the Pentagon. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Max Mosley went to the European Court of Human Rights with his application against the United Kingdom. [read post]