Search for: "Public Service Co. v. United Cable"
Results 81 - 100
of 155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2014, 2:16 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 1:34 pm
[1] American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 6:23 pm
Ms Kelly-Brown argued that the defendants’ repeated use of the phrase “Own Your Power” had caused reverse confusion within the market for motivational services and publications, and therefore infringed her service mark. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:17 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:17 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:07 am
As if the judge’s conduct subsequent to publication was important. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
After all, performances are transmitted from Aereo’s service to members of the public just like they are from some cloud computing services. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Professional Janitorial Service, Inc. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:55 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
United Steelworkers (Ont. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
A third reporter produced a report dated 28 September 2009, in which he recommended that all of the heads of complaint made by the interested party should be dismissed apart from one finding of inadequate professional services. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm
I’ve been following American Broadcasting Cos. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
The Price and Hughes interviews apparently aroused some interest within the Police Service of Northern Ireland. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
The Bill of Costs comes with a request to file two exhibits under seal, because one service provider doesn't want the names of its employees made public. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
The investigator ascertained that the Internet Protocol (IP) address used by the child pornographer was assigned to a customer of Comcast Cable Communications, an internet service provider, and the investigator asked Comcast to provide certain information about the account of that customer. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:05 pm
Therefore, as a public service, this firm will endeavor to present a weekly, updated list of recalls…from that particular week. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
Ten years after the publication of an article about Naomi Campbell, the European Court of Human Rights decided that the recovery of success fees from the Mirror would be “disproportionate“, in MGN v United Kingdom (Case No. 39401/04). [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
It appreciates the enormous publicity value to be obtained [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
” Viacom v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:46 pm
Buckley v. [read post]
