Search for: "Public Service Company v. Brown" Results 81 - 100 of 800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2014, 6:23 pm
Ms Kelly-Brown argued that the defendants’ repeated use of the phrase “Own Your Power” had caused reverse confusion within the market for motivational services and publications, and therefore infringed her service mark. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 10:54 am by Samuel Cohen
Clearly, had there been any failings in that security, the company would have attracted adverse publicity both within and beyond the courtroom, and potentially faced higher regulatory penalties. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
2016 has been a tough year for Section 230 jurisprudence, and the nadir (so far) was the appellate court ruling in Hassell v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  External liability v. internal liability A fundamental difference of management liability under German law compared to, for instance, the United States is that, in most cases, damage claims are not brought by third parties like employees or shareholders but by the company itself. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
Winston Gibson v Public Service Commission; Ranjan Rampersad v Commissioner of Police and Police Service Commission; Robert Ramsahai v Teaching Service Commission; Ashford Sankar & Others v Public Service Commission; Gopichand Ganga and Others v Commissioner of Police and Others; and Hermia Tyson-Cuffie v Public Service Commission (Trinidad and Tobago), heard 17 –… [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 3:23 pm by Shannon O'Hare
If you have any questions, or for further information please contact Anupreet Amole and Mark Dorff. i https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/58-01/0210/20210.pdf ii Clauses 7(4) and 7(5) iii Clause 18iv See the draft Statement of Policy Intent at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-and-investment-bill-2020/statement-of-policy-intent v Clause 13vi Clauses 19 and 20vii Clause 32viii Clause 34ix Clause 40x Clause 41xi Clause 26(5)(b The views… [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:32 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Geico was distinguishable from the issues presented in this case in that Gallagher involved the same insurance company on both insurance policies at issue and this case did not. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 6:57 am by Samuel Cohen
In England, a recent decision of the High Court highlights the strategic tensions at play for companies facing criminal investigation and subsequent or parallel civil litigation. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 11:30 am by luiza
  In 2015, food services provider Chartwells (a subsidiary of Compass Group) paid almost $20M to settle allegations of fraud in DC public schools’ meals programs. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am by Blog Editorial
Winston Gibson v Public Service Commission; Ranjan Rampersad v Commissioner of Police and Police Service Commission; Robert Ramsahai v Teaching Service Commission; Ashford Sankar & Others v Public Service Commission; Gopichand Ganga and Others v Commissioner of Police and Others; and Hermia Tyson-Cuffie v Public Service Commission (Trinidad and Tobago), heard 17 –… [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
Winston Gibson v Public Service Commission; Ranjan Rampersad v Commissioner of Police and Police Service Commission; Robert Ramsahai v Teaching Service Commission; Ashford Sankar & Others v Public Service Commission; Gopichand Ganga and Others v Commissioner of Police and Others; and Hermia Tyson-Cuffie v Public Service Commission (Trinidad and Tobago), heard 17 –… [read post]