Search for: "Putnam v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2019, 4:16 am
Co., 30 NY3d 704, 710 [2018]; Fourth Ocean Putnam Corp. v Interstate Wrecking Co., 66 NY2d 38, 44 [1985]). [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 11:19 am
In People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
[xx]Washington and Ohio also collect a B & O tax but on a state-wide basis. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:41 am
Certification of the payroll critical to lawfully paying an individual in the classified serviceEldridge v Carmel Cent. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 2:25 am
Putnam Investments v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 2:52 am
” People v Cox, 286 N.Y. 137, 142 (1941). [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 4:05 am
Applying the rational used by the court in Putnam, the Commissioner ruled that §3012(1)(a) was not applicable in Zalaman's situation and thus she was not entitled to a reduced probationary period. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 11:50 am
Ocheesee Creamery LLC v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:46 am
Whren v U.S., 517 US 806; People v Robinson, 97 NY2d 341. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:53 am
Bumpus v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 7:28 pm
It has further been held that no distinction need be made with respect to whether the property is personalty or realty (Putnam v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:56 am
Putnam Invs., Inc., 147 F.3d 7 (U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:11 am
Putnam’s Sons as the publisher of Fanny Hill. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
Putnam Investments, Inc., 147 F.3d 7, 10 (1st Cir. 1998). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 5:05 pm
Orders of Protections In New York State, including Westchester, Putnam, Rockland, and Orange counties there are two types of Orders of Protection issued by the criminal and/or family courts, Temporary Orders of Protection (TOP) and Final Orders of Protection (FOP). [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
While the states were seen as “laboratories of democracy” by Justice Brandeis in New State Ice Company v Liebmann – in recent years states have become “laboratories of national partisan politics,” to adopt Jessica Bulman-Pozen’s gloss on Brandeis. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:06 am
In Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
