Search for: "R C SMITH"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2023, 1:58 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the application of… [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:44 am
Lee C. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am
On Wednesday 3rdand Thursday 4th May the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Imam) v London Borough of Croydon, on appeal from [2022] EWCA Civ 601. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:29 am
Murray is supported by amicus briefs filed by Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) (who is something of an amicus machine recently) and Public Citizen. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
R. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:02 am
On Thursday 27th April, the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Worcestershire County Council) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 1957. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
An intertribal business court. / Crepelle, Adam C. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 2:19 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 07/04/23) East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others (Northern Ireland), heard 14th-15th December 2022 Smith and… [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:18 am
On Wednesday 5th April the Court will hand-down judgment in R (on the application of Pearce and another) v Parole Board for England and Wales [2023] UKSC 13. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:22 pm
Reed Smith will continue to track developments regarding the NO UPCODE Act, the Advance Notice, and their impact on Medicare Advantage reimbursement considerations. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:47 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the application of… [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 4:51 am
C. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
On Thursday 23rd March the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Officer W80) v Director General of the Independent Office for Police Conduct and others, on appeal from [2020] EWCA Civ 1301. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 7:17 pm
R. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am
On Monday 13th March and Tuesday 14th March the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Officer W80) v Director General of the Independent Office for Police Conduct and others, on appeal from [2020] EWCA Civ 1301. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 8:10 am
Décadas después al introducir el petróleo la geopolítica mundial dio un giro radical de 180°, y lo que a principios del XIX, cuando “el petróleo todavía se consideraba simplemente una cura contra las lombrices, la sordera, el dolor de muelas y la hidropesía” como cuenta Sonia Shah en el libro Crudo, guiaba a Europa y a Estados Unidos al cénit de la cultura europea, de la cultura occidental, y de su civilización… [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:49 am
C. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 7:30 am
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:59 am
Josh Smith and Joyce Lee report for Reuters. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
(c) In the case of an invention made by an AI machine, is the owner, creator and user of that AI machine entitled to the grant of a patent for that invention? [read post]
