Search for: "R V"
Results 81 - 100
of 145,026
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2007, 2:51 am
R v Clark “A case management decision refusing to order an adjournment before trial or indeed at any time before the start of the summing up could constitute a terminating ruling against which a prosecutor could appeal. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:31 am
R v Fazal [2009] WLR (D) 175 “A defendant who allowed another person to lodge, receive, retain or withdraw money which amounted to criminal property from the defendant's bank account, was to be regarded as having converted that property for the purposes of s 327(1)(c) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 3:35 am
R v Ghulam; [2009] WLR (D) 303 “The word ‘determination’ in s 4(6) of the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964 refers only to a determination that a defendant is unfit to plead so that, where that provision's requirement for evidence from two or more registered medical practitioners to be before the court has not been met, [...] [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 3:32 am
R v Seddon; [2009] WLR (D) 88 “In a European arrest warrant which sought a defendant's return to this jurisdiction as a convicted person for the extradition offence of blackmail an allegation that the defendant was unlawfully at large and in breach of bail did not amount to ‘an offence disclosed by the information provided … [...] [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 8:50 am
R v Massey “For the purposes of the offence of controlling prostitution for gain the meaning of ‘control’ did not involve ‘compulsion’, ‘coercion’ or ‘force’. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:22 am
R v K(A) [2009] EWCA Crim 1640; [2009] WLR (D) 269 “A party to ancillary relief proceedings was not entitled to invoke the privilege against self-incrimination to withhold information about his income and assets that exposed him to a risk of prosecution but since he would in those circumstances be acting under compulsion the information he [...] [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:27 am
R v Green [2008] UKHL 30; [2008] WLR (D) 152 “The Drug Trafficking Act 1994 fell to be construed without regard to legislation in other countries which had chosen to give effect to common international obligations in a different way. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 2:00 am
R v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 5:13 am
R v Ngyuen [2008] EWCA Crim 585; [2008] WLR (D) 94 “The mere fact that the Crown chose to rely on bad character evidence which it had decided not to make the subject of a criminal charge could not of itself have such an adverse effect on the fairness of the proceedings that the court ought not to admit that evidence. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:25 am
R v Blythe; [2008] WLR (D) 109 “Engaging in sexual activity in the presence of a child and causing a child to watch a sexual act were not serious specified sexual offences for the purposes of the provisions relating to dangerous offenders if the person committing the offence was under 18. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:26 am
Regina v R (L) [2010] EWCA Crim 924; [2010] WLR (D) 126 “Where a defendant was charged with offences relating to indecent images of children, arrangements to provide his lawyers with copies of those images for the sole purpose of discharging their professional responsibilities to the defendant, and the acceptance by them of access to the material for that purpose, could not in any circumstances be regarded as criminal. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:46 am
R v Guraj – Back to the Future or Part of Something Bigger? [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 10:29 am
Faegre & Benson, LLP v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 2:53 am
R v Porter; [2008] WLR (D) 167 “There was no obligation upon an employer in the conduct of his undertaking to guard against those risks which were merely fanciful. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:25 am
R v May [2008] UKHL 28; [2008] WLR (D) 151 “Where co-defendants had jointly received property as a result of criminal activity, each was liable to receive a confiscation order representing the entire value, as if he had acted alone, provided he had sufficient assets to meet the order. [read post]
29 May 2007, 2:34 am
R v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 2:37 am
R v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 2:33 am
R v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 2:31 am
R v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 8:25 am
R v M; [2008] WLR (D) 297 “Where a defendant in criminal proceedings was said to have breached a restraint order, imposed under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, by making certain prohibited transactions a judge of the Crown Court had jurisdiction to try an application made by the prosecution for the defendant to be committed for contempt. [read post]
