Search for: "R. B. vs B. T."
Results 81 - 100
of 743
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2021, 7:12 am
L. 106–95, §2(c), Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1316] (b) subject to section 1182(j)(2) of this title, who is coming temporarily to the United States to perform services (other than services described in subclause (a) during the period in which such subclause applies and other than services described in subclause (ii)(a) or in subparagraph (O) or (P)) in a specialty occupation described in section 1184(i)(1) of this title or as a fashion model, who meets the requirements for the… [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:12 am
L. 106–95, §2(c), Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1316] (b) subject to section 1182(j)(2) of this title, who is coming temporarily to the United States to perform services (other than services described in subclause (a) during the period in which such subclause applies and other than services described in subclause (ii)(a) or in subparagraph (O) or (P)) in a specialty occupation described in section 1184(i)(1) of this title or as a fashion model, who meets the requirements for the… [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
Read more: Heidi Weber, Respondent vs. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:41 am
Nokia vs. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 7:00 am
For context, let me offer a recap of the past 14 months, with a couple flashbacks sprinkled in: In October 2019, the public comment hearings for the Group B codes were held. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Pol Púb. y Leg. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:54 am
[h/t Jonathan Adler] Here is how that idiotic "one in a quadrillion" estimate was derived. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:07 pm
While the FLÜGEL case concerned specifically energy drinks vs. alcoholic drinks, the General Court made a reference to previous decisions in which it had held that “the average [German] consumer is used to and aware of the distinction between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks” (LINDENHOF, T‑296/02, para. 54 and MEZZOPANE, T‑175/06, para. 80) and concluded that the same applied to energy drinks and alcoholic drinks. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:28 am
While the FLÜGEL case concerned specifically energy drinks vs. alcoholic drinks, the General Court made a reference to previous decisions in which it had held that “the average [German] consumer is used to and aware of the distinction between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks” (LINDENHOF, T‑296/02, para. 54 and MEZZOPANE, T‑175/06, para. 80) and concluded that the same applied to energy drinks and alcoholic drinks. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:03 am
In particular, one could imagine bypassing the protocol given by the Huawei vs. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 5:35 am
Der Grund für die Warnung war allerdings damals nicht die Mitgliedschaft und Tätigkeit für die FDP, sondern die Agentur speakers.ch ag von Girsberger: «[…] Sie vermittelt Redner für Workshops, Tagungen oder Symposien. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 5:26 pm
Taylor is liable, he should have made such argument in his 12(b)(6) motion. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:29 am
[B.] [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 6:50 am
Why don’t employers just offer a higher salary or a bonus? [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 11:27 pm
Secondly, the court asks for a clarification of several issues in connection with the Huawei vs. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 10:06 am
These efforts bring connect patented inventions to “upstream funding and R&D as well as downstream commercialization efforts. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 10:13 am
[B.] [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 4:18 am
Torres, de 1978, y Harris vs Rosario, de 1980, que tiene que ver con un programa de ayuda especial para las familias con menores (AFDC). [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
People across the country have made it clear that they don’t want to eat genetically engineered salmon, and food retailers are clearly listening,” said Dana Perls, food and technology program manager at Friends of the Earth. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 12:49 pm
R. 213(b) Typically, both sides issue interrogatories to the other side. [read post]
