Search for: "R.C."
Results 81 - 100
of 1,133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2022, 12:41 pm
Secondly, as a result of SB 47 the new R.C. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 7:21 am
At issue in this case is whether Ohio’s statutory cap on non-economic damages, codified in R.C. 2315.18, is unconstitutional as applied to the facts in … Continue reading → The post What’s On Their Minds: Tort Reform Revisited. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 5:13 am
At issue in this case is whether Ohio’s statutory cap on non-economic damages, codified in R.C. 2315.18, is unconstitutional as applied to … Continue reading → The post Oral Argument Preview: Tort Reform Revisited. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:24 am
Instead, under R.C. 4743.10(B), the Court is bound simply to examine whether Defendant holds genuine ethical concerns contrary the proposed course of treatment. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 4:05 am
Ohio R.C. 2907.05(A). [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Edgar, R.C., Taylor, J., Lin, V. et al. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 2:34 pm
" (citing R.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:33 am
Locke was arrested and charged with a violation of R.C. 2903.13(A) for attempting to or actually inflicting physical harm upon a law enforcement officer, a fourth-degree felony offense and an enumerated "offense of violence" under R.C. 2901.01(A)(9). [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 10:52 am
” R.C. 2710.05(A)(6). [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 10:52 am
” R.C. 2710.05(A)(6). [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 2:45 pm
[2] R.C. 1707.43(A). [read post]
16 Oct 2021, 8:35 am
., Slip Opnion No. 2021-Ohio-3445, the Ohio Supreme Court interpreted “final,” within R.C. 3314.08(K)(2)(d), with its ordinary meaning and not a legal term of art. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 10:38 am
R.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 3:31 pm
Thus, the court found that Bivens abused his discretion in determining that the petitioners’ referendum petition was insufficient because they had not complied with R.C. 731.32. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 2:00 am
In a divorce, the statute that establishes that is R.C. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 10:41 am
To be sure, R.C. 3105.171(I) provides that a domestic relations court can only subsequently modify a final property division upon the express, written consent or agreement of the parties. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 6:01 am
Respondent has not yet apologized to R.C. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 6:08 am
Respondent and R.C., who occupied adjacent cubicles, had an... [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 7:42 am
See R.C. 5751.42. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:13 am
“Because R.C. 109.78(D) and R.C. 2923.122(D)(1)(a) are unambiguous and do not conflict with each other, we must apply both statues as written unless and until the General Assembly directs otherwise by legislative action. [read post]
