Search for: "RAMIREZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA"
Results 81 - 95
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2009, 4:06 am
" See also Florida Dep't of Revenue v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 2:37 am
Supreme CourtValdes, 34 FLW 116, New dj test, 775.021(4) (b) (2) prohibits separate punishments for crimes arising from the same criminal transactions only when the statute itself provides for an offense with multiple degrees-, (4)(b)(2) offenses constitute different degree of same offenses with multiple degrees, discharging a firearm within 1000 feet of a person in violation of 790.15(2) and shooting into an occupied vehicle 790.10 same offense does not violate double jeopardy, State… [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
He died 3 days later of the injuries at the age of 47. * 1599: Nanda Bayin, a Burman king, reportedly laughed to death when informed, by a visiting Italian merchant, that “Venice was a free state without a king. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 11:20 am
Petersburg, Florida. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, November 05, 2008 US v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
Plaintiff Janet Mohnkern brought suit claiming she was owed attorneys' fees under Florida law by defendant The Professional Insurance Company. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, August 27, 2008 Ramirez v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, August 27, 2008 Ramirez v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:02 pm
United States District Court Judge James Robertson for the District of Columbia, issued an order in USA v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:24 am
Lauderdale is assisting on the internet pharmacy case, United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
Ramirez v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
Ramirez v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Lambert, No. 05-99011Denial of habeas relief from a conviction and death sentence for the first-degree murders of petitioner's wife and business partner is affirmed as: 1) a state court's holding that the trial court did not violate Faretta v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Supp. 151, 156-57 (S.D.N.Y. 1988).Deference to the FDA was the express basis of the decision in Ramirez v. [read post]
