Search for: "RANGE v. UNITED STATES COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY"
Results 81 - 100
of 136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Mendez in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:57 am
Commissioner. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Commissioner, the court held that special trial judges of the United States Tax Court were officers, not employees. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm
This was implemented into domestic legislation by the much debated Data Protection Act 2018 [pdf], The ICO’s press release can be found here and comments from the Commissioner Elizabeth Denham here. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:00 am
Legal Framework The Home Office—a ministerial department with responsibilities ranging from securing the U.K. border and controlling immigration to handling terrorist threats and crime prevention—holds the general responsibility for regulation of FRS, with two independent commissioners overlapping in the as-of-yet poorly defined area of Facial Recognition Technology regulation: the Office of the Biometrics Commissioner and the Surveillance… [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, they were well aware of the implications the decision holds for the administrative state. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 4:25 pm
United States The Financial Stability Board has issued a note to finance ministers of the G-20 on the development [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:55 pm
To the ends of developing the framework for guiding principles the Independent expert "undertook a mapping of the social and human rights impact assessment tools used by States, international organizations and non-State actors" and organized meetings of experts ("Report ¶9). [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:04 pm
Given the rise of the #MeToo movement Norton Rose Fulbright Social Media Law Bulletin notes the impact of employees taking to social media to air their grievances. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm
This Tiered process has annual fees ranging from £40 through to £2,900. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:44 am
The United Nations continues this work through its many mandate holders. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm
Some 40 or so years later, Chairman Clayton’s regeneration of Judge Sporkin’s gatekeeper liability lays the regulatory foundation for a successful and vast SEC ICO assault, which will leave some ICO lawyers looking over their shoulders, and others perhaps dashing for cover. 1970s: SEC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
Co-director of enforcement Stephanie Avakian touted the Cyber Unit’s second ICO enforcement action, stating: “We will continue to scrutinize the ICO market vigilantly for improper offerings that seek to sell securities to the general public without the required registration or exemption. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
In 2008 in K.U. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
Deputy Assistant Secretaries of State Patrick Murphy and Marc Storella will testify alongside V. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm
United States Blog Law Online has a post dealing with the question “Is journalism harassment? [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm
United States George W. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
College Dist. that under circuit precedent, “transgender individuals may state viable sex discrimination claims on the theory that the perpetrator was motivated by the victim’s real or perceived non-conformance to socially-constructed gender norms. [read post]
