Search for: "RECORD v. RECORD" Results 81 - 100 of 71,821
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2024, 7:40 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Nor is there any evidence in the record here of hospitals overriding or failing to accommodate doctors' conscience objections. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
However, extending the return window reveals that V-shaped reversals are transient and that long-term performance does not systematically differ with or without a V-shaped reversal. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:36 pm by Kelly Lavelle
The court highlighted the distinction between traditional and modern attachments in the 2021 case, Nichols v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 11:43 am by Dylan Gibbs
— Dylan Gibbswith Michel HajjarTODAY'S DOCKETSetting the shrouded record straightJailing a lawyer for contemptSuing clients for bad reviewsHong Kong retirements, vaccinated juries, and restrictive covenantsCOURT ACCESSSCC clears up secret trials in-camera proceedingsCBC v Named Person, 2024 SCC 21If you expected the Supreme Court to rally against Quebec's "secret trial", Friday's decision probably came as a surprise. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:39 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It arises in a criminal case where the defendant was accused of making threats relating to his employment with the Post Office.The case is United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Given the severity of petitioner's assault on Annette, which caused her to lose consciousness, as well as his prior disciplinary record, the penalty of dismissal does not shock the conscience (see Matter of Astacio v Bratton, 146 AD3d 613, 614 [1st Dept 2017]; Matter of Guzman v Bratton, 161 AD3d 591, 593 [1st Dept 2018]). [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Given the severity of petitioner's assault on Annette, which caused her to lose consciousness, as well as his prior disciplinary record, the penalty of dismissal does not shock the conscience (see Matter of Astacio v Bratton, 146 AD3d 613, 614 [1st Dept 2017]; Matter of Guzman v Bratton, 161 AD3d 591, 593 [1st Dept 2018]). [read post]