Search for: "RECORD v. RECORD"
Results 81 - 100
of 71,821
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2024, 8:15 am
Schutte v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:40 am
Nor is there any evidence in the record here of hospitals overriding or failing to accommodate doctors' conscience objections. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 6:54 am
Hall Company, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 6:54 am
Hall Company, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 5:01 am
.'"] From the Florida Court of Appeal's decision yesterday in CNN, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
(Blacklock’s Reporter) v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
However, extending the return window reveals that V-shaped reversals are transient and that long-term performance does not systematically differ with or without a V-shaped reversal. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:48 pm
"] From today's decision of the Florida Court of Appeal in Doe v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:36 pm
The court highlighted the distinction between traditional and modern attachments in the 2021 case, Nichols v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:12 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 12:25 pm
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 11:43 am
— Dylan Gibbswith Michel HajjarTODAY'S DOCKETSetting the shrouded record straightJailing a lawyer for contemptSuing clients for bad reviewsHong Kong retirements, vaccinated juries, and restrictive covenantsCOURT ACCESSSCC clears up secret trials in-camera proceedingsCBC v Named Person, 2024 SCC 21If you expected the Supreme Court to rally against Quebec's "secret trial", Friday's decision probably came as a surprise. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
Garrigan v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:39 am
It arises in a criminal case where the defendant was accused of making threats relating to his employment with the Post Office.The case is United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:06 am
In a memorandum opinion in Moxley v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Given the severity of petitioner's assault on Annette, which caused her to lose consciousness, as well as his prior disciplinary record, the penalty of dismissal does not shock the conscience (see Matter of Astacio v Bratton, 146 AD3d 613, 614 [1st Dept 2017]; Matter of Guzman v Bratton, 161 AD3d 591, 593 [1st Dept 2018]). [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Given the severity of petitioner's assault on Annette, which caused her to lose consciousness, as well as his prior disciplinary record, the penalty of dismissal does not shock the conscience (see Matter of Astacio v Bratton, 146 AD3d 613, 614 [1st Dept 2017]; Matter of Guzman v Bratton, 161 AD3d 591, 593 [1st Dept 2018]). [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 5:01 am
From Hayes v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:09 pm
In Nienaber v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:18 am
She recorded the discussion. [read post]