Search for: "RICKS V. STATE"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,737
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2010, 7:38 am
Supreme Court case, which you can be sure that everyone who votes for, against, or rails about having to vote for or against, state judges will be interested in reading:Caperton v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:10 pm
Dan’s and Rick’s posts very helpfully summarize the impacts of the Court’s decision today. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
by Dennis Crouch EveryMD v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 6:32 pm
It's not every day that a federal court imposes Continuing Legal Education requirements as a sanction to attorneys in a case, but that is what happened in to Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach in Fish v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:42 pm
We're involved in HT litigation, so we can't comment much, but readers will want to look at Rick v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 8:10 am
Rick Perry has signed more criminal justice reform legislation, arguably, than any sitting U.S. governor. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:44 pm
By Rick Gautschi In State of Ariz. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:14 pm
League of Women Voters, et al. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 7:14 am
Frequent guest commenter Rick Freeman made an important point yesterday in a comment to our post on the Apache v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 2:15 am
However, the district court stated that “Congressional intent would be undermined by Ricks’ proposed interpretation. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:14 am
Rick Kittel and KU Defender Project student Julie Larson won in State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:10 pm
See Vance v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:56 pm
Rick Hasen (Election Law) has more. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
As this Court made very clear in State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 5:25 am
Source: Albany Time UnionIn its decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 85 U. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 12:10 pm
Over at Bench Memos, Rick Garnett makes two points about the effect of a potential Obama Presidency on abortion politics that push in opposite directions.On the one hand, Rick argues that pro-life advocates (and in particular Doug Kmiec) should not support Obama because it is important to overturn Roe v. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 10:40 pm
By a 5-4 vote, the Court in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:57 pm
" Rick Hasen has just posted this draft, entitled "The Untimely Death of Bush v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:20 am
Your correspondent returns to the Fort Meade CCTV outpost, to take in almost-live broadcasts of the day’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 12:46 pm
(But see Crawford…) And while Rick’s discussion here focuses on pre-election v. post-election relief, the Article above builds on Rick’s point in a different piece: even pre-election, logistical difficulties increase the later it gets in the election cycle. [read post]
