Search for: "ROBERTS V COMMERCE"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2010, 4:15 am
In Sherman v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 3:13 am
Scott v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am
And finally, on the last day of the term, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:48 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court weighs far-reaching effects of Calif. pork restrictions. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:19 pm
Roberts’s strategic sacrifice in NFIB v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 10:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 11:20 am
Robert Barnes reports at WaPo.The census hasn’t asked the question of each household since 1950, and a federal judge last month stopped the Commerce Department from adding it to the upcoming count. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm
District Court Judge Robert E. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
Note: The following piece about oral argument in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 8:51 am
E-Commerce * Woodards v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Pacific Co. v Arizona (1945) demonstrates that state laws might violate the Commerce Clause even when in-state and out-of-state commerce are treated equally. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:43 pm
“ObamaCare Lost on the Medicaid Mandate & Commerce Power. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm
Supreme Court to overturn state tax laws that discriminate against interstate commerce or otherwise impede it, a power Justice Kennedy (as well as Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito) have exercised on occasion. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:37 am
Just a few examples: Lawrence v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 7:20 am
On Monday, a sharply divided Supreme Court held in Comptroller v. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 7:21 pm
John Dudas, Undersecretary of Commerce, John Doll, Commissioner of Patents, John Love, Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, and Robert Bahr, Senior Patent Attorney are scheduled to be deposed between the 7th and 14th of December, 2007. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 9:24 am
" It is all the more unfortunate that unsupported accusations about the Chief Justice's "political" behavior in NFIB v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm
The same was true of why five of the nine Supreme Court justices ruled the way they did on the remedy issue in Bush v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:52 am
In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court has held the individual mandate provision of the Affordable Care Act to be constitutional (National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius, June 28, 2012, Roberts, J). [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:30 am
This happened in Comptroller v. [read post]
