Search for: "ROSE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 81 - 100 of 215
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 10:12 am by Garrett Hinck
The justices agreed to consider the Justice Department’s appeal in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
Noble Maillard, Kevin and Rose Cuison Villazor, eds. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Wray is a partner at King & Spalding and formerly served at the Department of Justice from 2003 to 2005 as Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm by Matthew Kahn
Amira Mikhail and Jordan Brunner summarized the Justice Department’s cert petition in IRAP v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
The Code of Federal Regulations, which lists those rules, is about six times as large as the U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:24 am by Rishabh Bhandari, Jordan Brunner
  Quinta examined whether the Justice Department just admitted doubts over Trump’s oath in its brief on appeal in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am by David Kris
”  It directed each relevant “department and agency . . . [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm by Kami N. Chavis
Now, criminal justice reform advocates are pondering the fate of the federal government’s police reform efforts under a Justice Department (DOJ) led by U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
The Tenure in Office Act was repealed in 1887, and in the case of Myers v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:54 am by Victoria Kwan
The Justice Department’s news release covering the speech is available online. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:48 am by INFORRM
The Norton Rose Fulbright blog discusses these here, suggesting we may have to wait for the law to catch up with technology. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by John Elwood
  Only time shall tell if four Justices have true love’s passion for the question whether the Department of Labor improperly denied third-party home care companies the ability to avail themselves of statutory home-care overtime exemptions. [read post]