Search for: "ROYAL MARKETING, LLC"
Results 81 - 100
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
', Lars Brahms looks at the recent England and Wales High Court decision of Vestel Elektronik Sanayi v HEVC Advance LLC, which raised this question as well as the questions of what the proper basis would be for such a claim, and where this claim might be brought.Trade MarksGuestKat Nedim Malovic examines an intriguing decision from the General Court, which stated that the relevant public's attention is 'average at best' when assessing likelihood of confusion… [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:07 am
.; Bryce Welker; Royal Corniche Travel Ltd.; VRBO.com, Inc.; Experience Credit Unions, LLC; Jaclothing.com; Glacier International; ABNHotels.com; 1&1 Internet, Inc.; Conde Nast Digital; Flixter, Inc.; Financing-USA.com; SodaHead, Inc.; NuMedia Marketing, Inc.; Jynell Berkshire; Tzvetelin Petrov; Los Pentecostales del Area de la Bahia; 10Best, Inc.; Keyes Outdoor Advertising; Zoom Communications Inc.; Christine Nevogt; Zarzar, Inc.; Hydro-Gear; Tam T. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:36 pm
New York case law is consistent that in absence of privity, a cause of action may not be maintained for breach of contract (Plaisir v Royal Home Sales, 81 AD3d 799 [2d Dept 2011]; CDJ Builders Corp v Hudson Group Construction, 67 AD3d 720 [2009]; Grinnell v Ultimate Realty, LLC, 38 AD3d 600 [2007]; M. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
At the end of October, as part of the China state visit to the UK, the China-Britain Business Council and British Chamber of Commerce in China hosted the third UK-China Intellectual Property Symposium at The Royal Society. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:25 am
This strategic move will unlock a range of cross-selling and growth opportunities with existing customers and prospects, strengthening Nuix’s position in the market. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 8:10 am
Our firm has also handled many shareholder and LLC disputes between owners of closely held corporations, and LLCs. [read post]
Over 800,000 units of cream cheese under various brands recalled because of Salmonella contamination
6 Jun 2024, 6:27 am
Distributed by Piggly Wiggly LLC, Keene NH 03431. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:26 am
Said Royal Dutch Shell's legal director, "Law firms have had Christmas every day for decades now, but the party is over. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
Market Manipulation Schemes: U.S. vs. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
Market Manipulation Schemes: U.S. vs. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 1:41 am
© 2010 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Intersal designated Nautilus Productions, LLC, owned by petitioner Frederick Allen, to document the project. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:51 am
Procter & Gamble Distributors, LLC, 766 F.3d 1296 (11th Cir. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:30 am
“Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible,” – Lord Kelvin, president, Royal Society, 1895. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
Butterball, LLC (Docket Report) Draco Hygienic Products – ALJ Gildea grants motion terminating Draco respondents from Inv. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 12:33 pm
Royal & Sunalliance Ins. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:21 am
" Residential Capital LLC/RALI Certificates: In a March 31, 2010 order (here), Southern District of New York Harold Baer, Jr., citing his own prior ruling in the Royal Bank of Scotland/Harborview Mortgage Trust case (about which, refer to yesterday’s post, here), granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motions to dismiss in the lawsuit brought with respect to mortgage-backed certificates issued by Residential Capital, known as RALI Certificates. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Court of Appeal finds no reason to swipe right in MATCH v MUZMATCH online dating disputeMatch Group, LLC v Muzmatch Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 454 (April 2023)“MATCH” is hardly a distinctive trade mark for an online dating, aka matchmaking, service. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
In most trade mark cases waiting a little longer to see the Defendant off the market would not, in my view, cause the Claimant a huge additional loss. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
(EPLAW) Cheapflights: OHIM excludes likelihood of confusion between conflicting signs, due to very low degree of distinctive character of earlier marks: T-460/09; T-461/09 (Class 46) General Court upholds opposition brought by PEPE JEANS against PEPEQUILLO CTM application: T-580/08 (Class 46) Royal treatment rejected in Luxembourg: T-397/09 (Class 46) ‘G’: Emram v OHIM: Guilty against Gucci (Class 46) General Court: summer time I and II – ‘Space of… [read post]
